H2 Formation Treatment
This routine is activated when the H2FORM = CT02 flag is specified in the config.mk. The function implements the detailed H₂ formation model developed by
Cazaux & Tielens, which accounts for:
Thermal Physics:
Mean thermal velocity of hydrogen atoms: \(v_{th} = 1.45 \times 10^5 \sqrt{T_g / 100}\) cm/s
Temperature-dependent sticking coefficient from Hollenbach & McKee (1979)
Grain Surface Chemistry:
Separate treatment for silicate and graphite grains
Distinction between physisorbed and chemisorbed hydrogen atoms
Energy barriers (saddle points) between adsorption sites
Desorption energies for H atoms and H₂ molecules
Vibrational frequencies in surface sites
Formation Efficiency:
Computes efficiency factors for both silicate and graphite grains
Accounts for competition between H₂ formation, desorption, and surface diffusion
Includes the fraction of newly formed H₂ that remains on grains (μ = 0.005)
Formulation
Sticking Coefficient (Hollenbach & McKee (1979)):
Silicate Formation Efficiency:
- Graphite Formation Efficiency:
Similar formulation with graphite-specific parameters.
Final Rate:
where \(Z\) is the metallicity scaling factor equivalent to the dust-to-gas ratio normalized to \(10^{-2}\).
Parameters Used
Parameter |
Value |
Description |
Flux (F) |
1.0×10⁻¹⁰ |
H atom flux in monolayers per second |
A_silicate |
8.473×10⁻²² |
Silicate grain cross section per H nucleus (cm²) |
A_graphite |
7.908×10⁻²² |
Graphite grain cross section per H nucleus (cm²) |
Silicate Grain Properties:
μ (retention fraction): 0.005
E_S (saddle energy): 110 K
E_H2 (H₂ desorption): 320 K
E_HP (physisorbed H): 450 K
E_HC (chemisorbed H): 30000 K
ν_H2 (H₂ vibration): 3.0×10¹² s⁻¹
ν_HC (H vibration): 1.3×10¹³ s⁻¹
Graphite Grain Properties:
μ (retention fraction): 0.005
E_S (saddle energy): 260 K
E_H2 (H₂ desorption): 520 K
E_HP (physisorbed H): 800 K
E_HC (chemisorbed H): 30000 K
ν_H2 (H₂ vibration): 3.0×10¹² s⁻¹
ν_HC (H vibration): 1.3×10¹³ s⁻¹
Notes
The function includes commented-out alternative formulations from:
Traditional rate with simple temperature dependence
de Jong (1977) treatment with exponential cutoff
Tielens & Hollenbach (1985) treatment
The 2012 Leiden workshop
Metallicity scaling is applied to the final rate, assuming linear dependence on metal abundance relative to solar.